Existing Wikipedia article support reviews factual concerns, outdated information and citation gaps in a published article. We identify suitable evidence and prepare transparent talk-page edit requests so independent editors can assess proposed changes.
What an evidence-based edit request contains
- The exact passage or factual issue being reviewed.
- A specific proposed change, supported by suitable published sources.
- An explanation of how those sources support the change.
- Disclosure of the contributor’s relationship to the subject and any paid involvement.
Illustrative example — not a client project: a request to update a person’s role should identify the current wording, propose a precise replacement, and cite a publication that supports the new role and date. Another editor may accept, modify or decline the request.
See Wikipedia’s conflict of interest guideline and paid-contribution disclosure requirements. If you are considering a new article, start with a notability assessment.
Common situations
- Outdated job titles, roles or company details
- Claims with no citation, or with broken or weak sources
- Factual errors that published sources contradict
- Articles tagged for promotional tone or missing references
How we help
- A content and citation review of the current article
- Reliable sources for each proposed change
- Clearly worded edit requests for the article’s talk page
- Guidance on conflict-of-interest disclosure and how editors respond
Reliably sourced information cannot be removed simply because it is unfavorable. What we can do is make sure the article reflects the best available sources.