WikiExpertsUSA[1]

Credibility begins with the evidence.

We help you understand Wikipedia’s standards, assess the coverage about you, and develop clear, neutral content when the sources support it.

Request a notability review See how we work

Research first. Clear expectations. No publication guarantees.

Example subject

An illustration, not a real article

The researcher is known for work on immune response in early childhood, and was named to an endowed chair in 2021.[citation needed][1][2][3]

  1. [1]Profile in a national newspaper
  2. [2]University announcement of the chair
  3. [3]Peer-reviewed review article citing the work
Status: Unsupported claim

The right support at the right stage

Whether you are exploring an idea or improving an existing article, every engagement starts with the facts.

Notability assessment

Find out whether the independent coverage about you supports a Wikipedia article, with a written source-by-source review.

About the assessment

Research and article drafting

Turn suitable published sources into a balanced, structured draft where every statement has a traceable reference.

About drafting

Existing article support

Find sourcing gaps, review factual concerns and prepare transparent edit requests for an article that already exists.

About article support

A measured process

Good research comes before good writing. Wikipedia editors decide what is accepted, so we prepare you for that from the start.

  1. Understand the subject

    Your goals, existing coverage, and any previous submissions or concerns.

  2. Evaluate the evidence

    The depth, reliability and independence of each source, with strengths and gaps explained.

  3. Develop a neutral draft

    Factual content with careful citations, only where the evidence supports moving forward.

  4. Navigate the next step

    Disclosure and community review routes, explained plainly.

Before you begin, know what matters

A successful business, an impressive career or an active social presence does not automatically qualify a subject for an article. Significant coverage in reliable, independent publications is central.

Read our approach in full

  • Sources come firstPress releases, sponsored articles and your own website cannot replace substantial independent coverage.
  • Neutrality is essentialAn encyclopedic article presents a balanced account of published information. Promotional copy does not belong.
  • Transparency is part of the workPaid contributions are disclosed with employer, client and affiliation. Community decisions remain independent.

Common questions

A few things worth knowing before you get in touch.

See all questions

Can you guarantee a Wikipedia page?

No. We provide research, drafting and guidance, but approval, edits and retention are decided by Wikipedia’s volunteer community. No agency can honestly guarantee these outcomes.

Are you affiliated with Wikipedia?

No. WikiExpertsUSA is an independent service provider and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or part of Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.

What do I need for an initial review?

The subject’s name, an official website, and links to substantial independent coverage such as news articles, books or journal profiles. If a page or draft already exists, include its link and any reviewer feedback.

What happens if the subject is not ready?

The review explains the sourcing gaps. If the evidence does not support an article, the right next step is usually to wait rather than draft. Paid publicity and press releases do not establish notability.

Start with your sources

Send the subject’s name and links to independent coverage. We’ll tell you honestly what they support.

Request a review