Can you guarantee a Wikipedia page?
No. We provide research, drafting and guidance, but approval, edits and retention are decided by Wikipedia’s volunteer community. No agency can honestly guarantee these outcomes.
Are you affiliated with Wikipedia?
No. WikiExpertsUSA is an independent service provider and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or part of Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.
What do I need for an initial review?
The subject’s name, an official website, and links to substantial independent coverage such as news articles, books or journal profiles. If a page or draft already exists, include its link and any reviewer feedback.
What happens if the subject is not ready?
The review explains the sourcing gaps. If the evidence does not support an article, the right next step is usually to wait rather than draft. Paid publicity and press releases do not establish notability.
Can you remove negative information from an article?
We can assess factual or sourcing concerns and help prepare evidence-based edit requests on the article’s talk page. Reliably sourced information cannot be removed simply because it is unfavorable.
Will my involvement be disclosed?
Yes. Wikipedia’s terms of use require paid contributors to disclose their employer, client and affiliation. We follow those rules on every engagement.
How are scope, pricing and timing agreed?
After the initial source review we send a written proposal listing deliverables, fees and estimated research and drafting time. Wikipedia’s own review timeline is outside our control.
Do you work with academics and researchers?
Yes. Faculty and researchers are often assessed under Wikipedia’s academic notability guideline, which looks at citations, named chairs, major awards and similar evidence. We review that evidence carefully before recommending a draft.
Still have a question? Send it to us.